Bussiness Law

 write for one and half .

 

Here what I want you use in my paper and I want you write this in my perer step by step :

 

1- Issue

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

2.Rule

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

3- Analysis

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

4-Conclusion

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

5- What you learned

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

6-Content and Quality Connections

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Here the explain about that i need in that paper .

 

This will be the rubric used to evaluate your case submissions with the one exception that is noted in the Module 5.

 

 

 

IRAC Grading Rubric

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IRAC/Case Analysis Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Issue view longer description	Clearly identifies the relevant issue of the case 5 pts Identifies the issue but is not a clear and concise statement 4 pts Can see an issue but does not properly address it 3 pts Having difficulty concentrating on the issue. 2 pts Does not understand the issue 1 pts No Marks 0 pts	pts	Delete Criterion Link
Rule view longer description	Concisely states the rule 5 pts Mostly states the rule 4 pts Partially states the rule 3 pts Vaguely states the rule 2 pts Does not state the correct rule 1 pts No Marks 0 pts	pts	Delete Criterion Link
Analysis view longer description	Clearly shows an understanding how the law applies to the facts. 5 pts States how the facts and the law relate 4 pts Does not clearly state how the facts and law relate 3 pts Does not connect the facts or the law 2 pts Unable to apply the law to the facts 1 pts No Marks 0 pts	pts	Delete Criterion Link
Conclusion view longer description	Clearly and Concisely states the conclusion 5 pts States a good conclusion 4 pts States a conclusion that is not concise but still on point 3 pts States a conclusion 2 pts Does not state a conclusion 1 pts No Marks 0 pts	pts	Delete Criterion Link
What you learned view longer description	Clearly states what the case taught you 5 pts States what the case is about (paraphrases case) 4 pts States the case verbatim or interjected personal feelings into the response 3 pts States ideas not connected to the case 2 pts   Did not understand the case. 1 pts No Marks 0 pts	pts	Delete Criterion Link
Content and Quality Connections view longer description	Response is thoughtful, contains substantive insight and analysis in relation to topic. makes strong connections to readings, lecture, experience, workplace 5 pts Response(s) demonstrate significant understanding. Robust insight and analysis. Evidence of connections. 4 pts Content response is accurate but superficial. Some responses may be off topic. Acknowledges connections exist. 3 pts Lacks depth; responses too general, conclusory, simplistic in nature. Some aspects of response are off topic. Posts lack connections. 2 pts Interjected emotional responses, personal feelings, and /or beliefs in analysis 1 pts No Marks 0 pts	pts	Delete Criterion Link
Total Points: 30

 

 

HERE MY HW :

 

Original Post:

“After reading the case, assume you are a lawyer,  your client, Google has been sued by the Company, Perfect 10 for copyright infringement.  Google comes to you for advice.  What would you advise Google to do?
Consider:
1. the inherent powers of the court to decide copyright issues
2. rights of both parties with regard to intellectual property issues under copyright law.
3. remedies discussed in the case and your book
4. other issues discussed by the court

You, as a lawyer must be objective and NOT  insert your personal beliefs in the answer.  Use the IRAC analytical format to  respond to each separate issue you find (there are more issues than listed)” 

 You may do additional internet research,   the search terms “Google”  and “9th Circuit”  will be helpful.

Response Posts: Respond to the posts of at least 2 other students.
                   Note: You will not be able to respond to the other posts until you have submitted your post.

Note: This response will be due two weeks from today.  This will give each student enough time to read and understand this case as well as promote a thoughtful discussion.

Click here for help on completing a Discussion Board post. 
See Calendar above for original post and response post due dates. Be sure that this course is selected in the side menu

 Google v. Perfect 10.pdf

Response Posts: Respond to the posts of at least 2 other students.

Click here for help on completing a Discussion Board post. 
See Calendar above for original post and response post due dates. Be sure that this course is selected in the side menu