Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource for each question. Must include in-text citations. Must include specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate with their own references. Please provide short but thorough sentences.
Supporting material: Will be uploaded after a tutor is chosen
Question #1:
The National Culture and Management Note and the Husted and Allen article both suggest that there are significant differences in ethics and managerial practices between countries. The Donaldson article and the Paine, Deshpande, Margolis & Bettcher article suggests that differences can be overcome and that it is possible to put in place transnational values to which all can adhere. With which perspectives do you agree? Please take a position and back it up with examples and relevant peer-reviewed journal articles.
Question #2:
Supporting material: https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-g…
To prepare for this discussion, please do the following:
Recall a personal experience in which your cultural beliefs and values were tested. This doesn’t have to be a global experience; it could be one that came about from moving to a different part of the country or starting work in a new company. What was the nature of the culture clash? Refer to the six dimensions described in the website by Hofstede Institute – which one of the six dimensions were involved? (https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)
For your discussion post, please do the following, tell your colleagues briefly about your experience, how it made you feel, which of the cultural dimensions you think it may have involved and why. Your initial post does NOT require a reference.
Question #3:
Supporting material: Attached after tutor is chosen
In week 11 you will be presenting findings of your project and possible recommendations to management. To prepare, your reading by Morgan has defined and outlined several tactics for good presentation skills, i.e., keeping topics short and to the point and knowing your audience.
What type of strategies will you employ when you present your final project?
Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 4-5 paragraphs each and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points.
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Initial Posting
|
Initial response displays an excellent understanding of the assigned case, the course readings, and the underlying concepts and includes the correct use of relevant terminology. Initial response additionally integrates specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. Initial response is clear, concise, and compelling.
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics
|
Entirely free of mechanical errors. These include: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting (font style and size).
|
|
|
|
|
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.